<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On OnRez and Baccarat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/</link>
	<description>The experiences in Second Life of Ordinal Malaprop. Scripting, design, observations, notes.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Second Life - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Second Life - Powered by SocialRank</title>
		<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-62830</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Second Life - Today&#8217;s Top Blog Posts on Second Life - Powered by SocialRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-62830</guid>
		<description>[...] On OnRez and Baccarat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On OnRez and Baccarat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordinal Malaprop</title>
		<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-52200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordinal Malaprop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-52200</guid>
		<description>I suspect that to not comment on specifics becomes instinctive after a while - though I would myself balk at the idea of attempting to classify every single potential gambling operation upon the Grid, and indeed there is no legal precedent, whereas there is for poker and baccarat and so on. Still, the most popular should have some sort of official statement made regarding them I would say, even if it is "Linden Laboratory does / does not consider X a form of prohibited gambling, and will / will not remove it, but cannot guarantee that this is an authoritative legal statement". After all, whilst they may be unable to determine exactly whether a particular game is Wagering in the eyes of the Law, they can at least say what actions _they_ would take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that to not comment on specifics becomes instinctive after a while - though I would myself balk at the idea of attempting to classify every single potential gambling operation upon the Grid, and indeed there is no legal precedent, whereas there is for poker and baccarat and so on. Still, the most popular should have some sort of official statement made regarding them I would say, even if it is &#8220;Linden Laboratory does / does not consider X a form of prohibited gambling, and will / will not remove it, but cannot guarantee that this is an authoritative legal statement&#8221;. After all, whilst they may be unable to determine exactly whether a particular game is Wagering in the eyes of the Law, they can at least say what actions _they_ would take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha Poindexter</title>
		<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-52199</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Poindexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-52199</guid>
		<description>"At least it is good that in this instance, what has been prohibited is fairly clear."

Compared to other recent decrees, 'tis so. Nevertheless, I was struck by the lack of any mention of Tringo, Slingo/Zyngo/DMC, and sploders. I daresay these are the dominant Games Of Chance in our realms, and I can see no grounds for making a distinction between them and the explicitly proscribed games. (To those who would note that Tringo involves some measure of skill in addition to chance, I would point out that this doesn't suffice to keep poker off the list.) If they are illegal, why the reticence towards saying so? If not, why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At least it is good that in this instance, what has been prohibited is fairly clear.&#8221;</p>
<p>Compared to other recent decrees, &#8217;tis so. Nevertheless, I was struck by the lack of any mention of Tringo, Slingo/Zyngo/DMC, and sploders. I daresay these are the dominant Games Of Chance in our realms, and I can see no grounds for making a distinction between them and the explicitly proscribed games. (To those who would note that Tringo involves some measure of skill in addition to chance, I would point out that this doesn&#8217;t suffice to keep poker off the list.) If they are illegal, why the reticence towards saying so? If not, why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ordinal Malaprop</title>
		<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-51853</link>
		<dc:creator>Ordinal Malaprop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-51853</guid>
		<description>Ah, good show, thank you! I was dreading having to go back and change all of my previous links and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good show, thank you! I was dreading having to go back and change all of my previous links and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade Lily</title>
		<link>http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-51844</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ordinalmalaprop.com/engine/2007/07/27/on-onrez-and-baccarat/#comment-51844</guid>
		<description>Hey Ordinal!  Thanks for the love.  :)  You'll be happy to hear that SLBoutique links to item pages now redirect properly, as well as the old links to storefronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ordinal!  Thanks for the love.  :)  You&#8217;ll be happy to hear that SLBoutique links to item pages now redirect properly, as well as the old links to storefronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
